The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes Cunning and Cleverness Quotes
How we cite our quotes: Citations follow this format: (Story.Paragraph)
Quote #1
"It is simplicity itself," said [Holmes]; "my eyes tell me that on the inside of your left shoe, just where the firelight strikes it, the leather is scored by six almost parallel cuts. Obviously they have been caused by someone who has very carelessly scraped round the edges of the sole in order to remove crusted mud from it. Hence, you see, my double deduction that you had been out in vile weather, and that you had a particularly malignant boot-slitting specimen of the London slavey." […]
I could not help laughing at the ease with which he explained his process of deduction. "When I hear you give your reasons," I remarked, "the thing always appears to me to be so ridiculously simple that I could easily do it myself, though at each successive instance of your reasoning I am baffled until you explain your process. And yet I believe that my eyes are as good as yours" (Bohemia.1.12-13).
Watson's response to Holmes's reasoning is like that of a man who's just had a magician's trick explained to him: it all seems so clear after an explanation… though otherwise you'd never be able to guess how it's done. Conan Doyle repeats this formula many times to remind the reader that Holmes is always many steps ahead of everyone around him.
Quote #2
"Well, but China?"
"The fish that you have tattooed immediately above your right wrist could only have been done in China. I have made a small study of tattoo marks and have even contributed to the literature of the subject. That trick of staining the fishes' scales of a delicate pink is quite peculiar to China. When, in addition, I see a Chinese coin hanging from your watch-chain, the matter becomes even more simple."
Mr. Jabez Wilson laughed heavily. "Well, I never!" said he. "I thought at first that you had done something clever, but I see that there was nothing in it after all."
"I begin to think, Watson," said Holmes, "that I make a mistake in explaining. 'Omne ignotum pro magnifico,' you know, and my poor little reputation, such as it is, will suffer shipwreck if I am so candid" (League.23-6)
(Omne ignotum pro magnifico is a standard Latin phrase that means "everything unknown seems grand.") In the previous passage we quoted in this section, Watson has an appropriate response to Holmes's genius: quiet awe. Here, Holmes is poking fun at Jabez Wilson for being too dumb to even get just how smart Holmes really is. But it seems like kind of a contradiction to us that the proof of Watson's intelligence is that he's smart enough to know how much smarter Holmes still is.
Quote #3
Indeed, I have found that it is usually in unimportant matters that there is a field for the observation, and for the quick analysis of cause and effect which gives the charm to an investigation. The larger crimes are apt to be the simpler, for the bigger the crime the more obvious, as a rule, is the motive. In these cases, save for one rather intricate matter which has been referred to me from Marseilles, there is nothing which presents any features of interest (Identity.11).
Holmes often makes this argument that simple problems offer the strangest examples of human behavior – think of the totally trivial-seeming goose and hat that start out "The Blue Carbuncle." But this idea of lowly questions being more meaningful than grand ones also has social meaning: for Holmes, social status takes a back seat to intellectual complexity.
Quote #4
'Pon my word, Watson, you are coming along wonderfully. You have really done very well indeed. It is true that you have missed everything of importance, but you have hit upon the method, and you have a quick eye for colour. Never trust to general impressions, my boy, but concentrate yourself upon details (Identity.86).
Poor Watson, he's always being told that he's "missed everything of importance." How does Holmes's interactions with Watson develop Holmes's own character for you? How does Watson act as Holmes's foil?
Quote #5
"Very good, Lestrade," said Holmes, laughing. "You really are very fine indeed. Let me see it." He took up the paper in a listless way, but his attention instantly became riveted, and he gave a little cry of satisfaction. "This is indeed important," said he.
"Ha! you find it so?"
"Extremely so. I congratulate you warmly."
Lestrade rose in his triumph and bent his head to look. "Why," he shrieked, "you're looking at the wrong side!"
"On the contrary, this is the right side." […]
"I've wasted time enough," said Lestrade, rising. "I believe in hard work and not in sitting by the fire spinning fine theories. Good-day, Mr. Holmes, and we shall see which gets to the bottom of the matter first." He gathered up the garments, thrust them into the bag, and made for the door (Bachelor.166-75).
Speaking of foils: if Holmes's relationship with Lestrade is so antagonistic, why do they keep working together? How does this scene illuminate both Holmes's and Lestrade's characters? Why might Conan Doyle find Lestrade a useful character to have around?
Quote #6
Pshaw, my dear fellow, what do the public, the great unobservant public, who could hardly tell a weaver by his tooth or a compositor by his left thumb, care about the finer shades of analysis and deduction! (Beeches.9).
Holmes is criticizing Watson's "romantic" representation of Holmes's deductive methods. Watson protests that his stories are popular, and Holmes replies, "what does the public know?" Here, we get a tiny snapshot of Holmes's slightly elitist attitude towards the whole question of cunning. Sure, Holmes may talk a good game about not caring about the status of his clients, but as far as logical reasoning goes – leave it to the professionals, folks.